Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Laura Matsue Guenther's avatar

Loved this!

It’s interesting to think about how wrong this kind of teaching can go when being used as a coverup for deeper issues, especially when you’re dealing with people with personality disorders who love to use rigid ideologies to maintain control.

IE the dominant man could be the perfect mask for a controlling narcissistic type, the feminine woman the fawning codependent. It seems like we are still in thick of polarity’s heyday and we have yet to see a bigger reveal of these underlying problems.

And yes, the inner union is so key. Many talk about this, yet so few seem to speak about the shadow work, withdrawal of idealized projections, and individuation process of both parties that must occur for this truly to take place.

Looking forward to hearing more from you about this!

Expand full comment
Aaron's avatar

I talk about this in my writing, YouTube channel, and in person. I was immersed in a very similar environment around the same time frame and experienced the masculine feminine polarity cult.

There is a need to know what more drastic forms of masculine and feminine look like to know what healthy balance might look like in potential and then lived experience. I think people are programmed to have fixed reality worldviews and that leaves them vulnerable to collapses and the shadow side.

I do think the right relationships offer good training grounds to develop a fluidity in an evolving person that requires a fluidity in worldview in the self. I think modern families are designed more as isolated survival contracts to prevent sacred communion of the divine feminine and masculine expressed through individuals which blossoms reality itself.

This focus of attack to increase separation is a repeated pattern that intentionally divides all aspects of the human being. I have diagrams that help explain the inner and outer world forces and forms.

Expand full comment
14 more comments...

No posts